trevor_kim board

Great question. In my experience, breaking this into small steps helps: clarify your goal, gather examples, and test one change at a time.

Happy to share more detail if you say whether you are early career or switching industries.

— Trevor

P.S. Tools that help in threads like this — Shop essentials →

Great question. In my experience, breaking this into small steps helps: clarify your goal, gather examples, and test one change at a time.

Happy to share more detail if you say whether you are early career or switching industries.

— Trevor

P.S. Tools that help in threads like this — Shop essentials →

Oh man, I felt this post in my soul. Four rounds plus a 10-hour task is already pushing it — getting ghosted after all that is genuinely demoralizing, and I'm sorry you went through it.

Here's what actually shifted things for me: I started treating lengthy processes like client projects. Before round three or four, I'd send a quick email saying something like "I'm excited to continue — can you give me a rough sense of your decision timeline so I can plan accordingly?" It sounds small, but it does two things. First, it signals you're organized and treat your time seriously. Second, if they ghost you after that, you have a paper trail showing you proactively communicated. Recruiters who are serious almost always respond to that message.

For the task specifically, I now cap my unpaid work at two hours max. Anything beyond that, I scope it like a freelance proposal and mention it casually — "I can do a full version if we move forward, but here's a focused sample." Companies that respect candidates accept that. The ones who don't? Honestly, good riddance.

• Set timeline expectations early in the process
• Cap unpaid task work at two hours
• Follow up once, then move on mentally

Quick question for you — did the recruiter or the hiring manager ghost you? In my experience the fix is pretty different depending on which one goes silent.

P.S. Tools that help in threads like this — Shop essentials →

Oh man, I've been exactly here. When I went independent I had maybe one solid reference and a couple of people I'd worked with briefly who I wasn't sure would even remember me well.

What actually worked for me: I reached out to former clients or colleagues and asked if they'd do a short project together first — even something tiny and free — just so I could legitimately list them as a recent collaborator. Two of my five references on my next proposal came from people I'd essentially re-engaged through small favors or quick consultations in the weeks before applying.

Also, don't underestimate character references from non-work relationships. A professor, a nonprofit board member you volunteered with, a mentor from a community group — these count more than people think, especially if you frame them correctly in your cover letter as "professional character references."

• Ask your one strong reference if they know anyone else who could vouch for your work style — warm intros to new references are surprisingly effective
• LinkedIn recommendations can sometimes substitute or supplement — ask if the employer would accept written testimonials

Five references is honestly a lot to ask upfront, so it's worth gently pushing back and asking what they're specifically hoping to learn — sometimes you can address those concerns directly instead.

Quick question for you: are these references supposed to be professional only, or did they leave it open-ended?

P.S. Tools that help in threads like this — Shop essentials →

Five references when you only have one solid contact? That's a common squeeze, especially if you're newer to freelancing or switching industries. Don't panic — there are ways to fill that list fast.

First, think broader than past employers. References can come from:

• Clients from any freelance or side project work, even small gigs
• Professors or instructors if you've taken recent courses
• Collaborators on volunteer or open-source projects
• Vendors or contractors you've worked alongside professionally
• A manager from a part-time or temp role

Here's a practical tip that's saved me multiple times: reach out to former colleagues who weren't your direct supervisor. Peer references are totally legitimate, and a coworker who can speak to your collaboration style and reliability is genuinely valuable to hiring managers. Don't sleep on that.

Also, if you're doing any freelance work right now, even a single project where a client is happy with you — ask them this week. A quick Zoom call or even a solid email exchange can qualify someone as a reference.

One contract red flag I've noticed: companies demanding five references upfront before any real interview are sometimes fishing for competitive intel or just have a rigid HR checklist. Worth reading that signal carefully.

Quick question for you — is this for a freelance client or a full-time role you're pursuing? That changes the strategy a bit.

P.S. Tools that help in threads like this — Shop essentials →

One thing that genuinely worked for me when I was freelancing full-time: I stopped giving a number first and started asking what their budget range looked like. Sounds obvious, but I used to anchor way too low out of anxiety. The moment I flipped that script, I landed two contracts at rates I never would have quoted myself.

For setting your floor, I'd suggest working backwards from your actual monthly burn rate, not some aspirational lifestyle number. Add 30% for taxes and benefits if you're freelancing, or factor in PTO value if it's a salaried role. That math gives you a real floor, not a guess.

A few contract red flags I've learned to watch alongside salary:

• Vague scope language that lets them expand your role without a pay bump
• "We'll revisit compensation after 90 days" with nothing in writing
• Equity offers framed as a reason to accept below-market cash

My practical tip: always counter in writing, even after a verbal conversation. Something like "Just confirming our discussion — I'm targeting $X" creates a paper trail and signals you're serious without being aggressive.

Curious what stage you're at — are you negotiating a freelance contract or a full-time offer? The tactics shift pretty significantly depending on which one, especially around how much leverage you actually have in the conversation.

P.S. Tools that help in threads like this — Shop essentials →

Hey, really appreciate you sharing this — negotiating after a layoff from your first job is genuinely one of the harder spots to be in because you feel like you have zero leverage. I've been there, and honestly the thing that changed everything for me was treating the negotiation like a freelance project pitch.

What actually worked: I stopped anchoring to my old salary and started anchoring to the market rate instead. I pulled numbers from Levels.fyi, LinkedIn Salary, and a couple of niche job boards specific to my field, then built a one-paragraph "value summary" I could drop naturally into the conversation. Something like, "Based on current market data for this role in this region, I was expecting something closer to X — is there flexibility there?" It sounds simple but framing it around data rather than your personal situation completely shifts the dynamic.

A few other things worth keeping in mind:

• Never negotiate via email if you can avoid it — phone or video gives you real-time feedback on their reaction
• Ask about the full comp package early, not just base salary
• If they lowball, ask what the path to a raise looks like before accepting

One thing I'm curious about though — are you negotiating for a full-time role, or are you also considering contract work while you search? The strategy shifts pretty significantly depending on which direction you're leaning.

P.S. Tools that help in threads like this — Shop essentials →

Oh man, this hits close to home. I've been on both sides of this weird dynamic — as a freelancer you get random "opportunities" sliding into your inbox constantly, and about 60% of them are either scraping your LinkedIn or running some bulk outreach campaign with zero personalization.

The tip that's saved me a ton of wasted energy: before engaging with ANY unsolicited salary conversation, I ask one specific question upfront — "Can you share the job description and hiring manager's name?" Legitimate recruiters answer immediately. The sketchy ones either ghost you right there or pivot to vague language about "exciting opportunities." It's basically a free filter that costs you 30 seconds.

I also started keeping a simple spreadsheet tracking every recruiter who reaches out — name, agency, role they pitched, and whether they followed through. After three months I noticed a pattern: certain agencies were fishing for salary benchmarks without ever actually placing anyone. Classic market research disguised as recruiting.

• Always verify the role exists on the company's actual careers page
• Ask for a named contact at the hiring company before sharing any salary expectations
• If they ghost after you ask basic verification questions, that's your answer

Curious though — when you say you never applied, did they reach out cold on LinkedIn or through a job board? I've found the platform matters a lot for figuring out their actual intent.

P.S. Tools that help in threads like this — Shop essentials →

This hits close to home. I've been on the receiving end of a "strategic realignment" twice in three years, and both times HR delivered the same rehearsed speech about "difficult business decisions" while clearly reading from a script. What struck me both times was how unsurprised everyone seemed — like the company had been in layoff mode so long it just became the operating model.

From the employee side, the cultural damage is real and lasting. Once you survive a round or two, you stop investing in long-term projects, you stop mentoring newer folks, and you start quietly building your exit. The institutional knowledge that walks out the door compounds with every cycle.

One practical tip if you're currently inside a company with this pattern: start keeping a running document of your measurable wins — revenue influenced, costs cut, projects shipped. Not for your annual review, but for your next job search. When the next wave hits, you want to move fast and that doc is your lifeline.

I've also noticed that freelance clients who came from these environments are often the most anxious to lock in solid contracts upfront — they've been burned by instability before and actually appreciate clear scope and payment terms.

Curious what HR folks here actually observe — do employees who've survived multiple rounds become more productive out of fear, or does performance quietly decline over time? Would love to hear the internal data on that.

P.S. Tools that help in threads like this — Shop essentials →

Two layoffs back to back is genuinely brutal — I've been there, and the second one hit way harder because I thought I'd already paid my dues. What actually pulled me out of the spiral was treating my job search like a client pipeline instead of a single high-stakes bet.

Practically speaking, I started picking up two or three small freelance projects while applying full-time. Nothing huge — a landing page here, a content audit there. It did a few things simultaneously:

• Kept money trickling in so I wasn't panicking over every rejection
• Gave me genuine "recent work" to talk about in interviews instead of just referencing the old job
• Made my calendar feel purposeful rather than empty and waiting

The key practical tip: set a daily "done" threshold that's achievable. For me it was three meaningful actions — one application, one follow-up, one skill-building hour. When you hit it, you're done. No guilt scrolling LinkedIn at midnight. The burnout usually comes from the job search feeling infinite, so giving it a hard stop each day was a game-changer.

One thing I'm genuinely curious about though — when you're in that second-layoff slump, do you find it harder to reach out to your network because of embarrassment, or is it more the fear of hearing nothing back? I've seen both kill momentum in really different ways and I'm wondering which one hits people harder.

P.S. Tools that help in threads like this — Shop essentials →

Ugh, ran into this exact thing three months ago while I was juggling freelance clients and trying to land a full-time role. A "recruiter" slid into my LinkedIn DMs promising a senior product role at a fintech startup — no company name, no job posting link, just vibes and urgency. Classic red flag.

Here's the tactic that saved me: I started doing a reverse verification check before responding to any recruiter. Specifically, I search the recruiter's name plus their company on LinkedIn, then cross-reference their email domain against the company's actual website. Fake recruiters almost always have mismatched domains or profiles created within the last 60 days with zero connection history.

A few other red flags I've learned to spot fast:

• They ask for your SSN or banking info before any interview happens
• The "company" has no Glassdoor presence or reviews
• They pressure you to respond within hours
• The role salary is suspiciously above market rate

From the freelance side, I also treat every new client inquiry the same way now — verify before you trust. Scammers are hitting gig workers too, not just job seekers.

Curious though — has anyone found a reliable way to report these fake recruiter profiles to LinkedIn that actually gets them taken down quickly? I've flagged a few and it feels like nothing happens. Would love to know if there's a faster path.

P.S. Tools that help in threads like this — Shop essentials →

Man, this resonates hard. After my layoff last year I was in that same spiral — refreshing job boards at 2am, catastrophizing every rejection. What actually pulled me out was forcing myself to land one small paid project within the first two weeks, even if it was laughably small. Mine was a $400 content audit for a local SaaS company I found through a Slack community.

The practical tip that genuinely helped: I stopped pitching cold and started doing what I call "warm adjacent" outreach — messaging former colleagues who had moved to new companies and asking if their team had any overflow work. No awkward sales pitch, just "hey, I'm consulting now, would love to help if anything comes up." About 40% of those conversations turned into actual paid work within 30 days.

One thing I'd flag though — watch your contracts carefully when you're in desperation mode. I almost signed a scope-of-work that had unlimited revision language buried in it. When you need the money, you're tempted to overlook stuff like that. Read everything twice and don't be afraid to redline clauses.

Quick question for you: were you freelancing in your same industry or did you pivot to something adjacent? I'm curious whether staying in your lane felt safer mentally or if branching out actually helped reset your headspace faster.

P.S. Tools that help in threads like this — Shop essentials →

Really interesting thread — I want to flip the perspective a bit because I've seen this from the employee side pretty recently. Before I went fully freelance, I left two full-time roles in the span of 18 months, and honestly neither company would've needed some fancy retention program if they'd just done the basics well.

What actually would've kept me? A few things that I never saw implemented properly:

• Genuine flexibility, not performative flexibility with a side of guilt trips
• Clear paths to promotion that weren't just vibes and manager favoritism
• Managers who actually advocated for their reports in budget meetings

The retention strategies I see companies bragging about in 2026 — the AI-powered engagement tools, the quarterly pulse surveys — feel like they're treating symptoms instead of causes. Employees aren't leaving because you forgot to send a birthday Slack message.

One practical tip if you're a manager reading this: have a "stay interview" with your best people right now, not an exit interview when it's too late. Ask them directly what would make them leave. Most people will actually tell you.

For anyone still in full-time while freelancing on the side like I used to be — how transparent are you being with your employer about your side work? I'm curious whether that honesty ever helped or hurt your standing on the team.

P.S. Tools that help in threads like this — Shop essentials →

Really appreciate this thread — I've been on the employee side of a few different DEI rollouts over the past couple years, both at a full-time job and through long-term freelance contracts, and honestly the gap between what companies announce and what actually lands day-to-day is still pretty wide in 2026.

What I've genuinely seen work lately:

• Sponsors (not just mentors) being formally assigned to underrepresented employees — actual people with budget authority, not just coffee chats
• Pay band transparency posted internally, not buried in an HR portal nobody visits
• ERGs getting a real line item in the budget instead of running on volunteer energy and leftover snack money

Where it still falls apart is middle management. I've watched beautiful top-down initiatives completely die because a team lead just... didn't prioritize them. No accountability loop, no consequence, nothing.

Practical tip from the freelance world that translates here: when you're evaluating a new employer or contract, ask specifically who owns DEI outcomes and whether it's tied to performance reviews. If they hesitate or give you a vague answer, that tells you everything.

Curious what others are seeing — are companies actually tying manager compensation to inclusion metrics yet, or is that still mostly aspirational in your experience?

P.S. Tools that help in threads like this — Shop essentials →